STUDYING  

2 comments Posted by Andrew

I have been away over the last week in Auckland for a Ministry Development Course. I'm still up here until Saturday doing some study in preparation for the worship seminar. At MDC we spent time talking about ministry and especially about where our focus is at in our ministries (John 15 - are we focussed on abiding in Christ or solely getting fruit?). In this light we were given this outstanding quote "are we so busy reaching the 'churched' that we're unchurching the churched?" Well worth pondering when it comes to the depth of the gospel in our churches.


Paul has posted some reflections from his DMin (demon??) research on contemporary Christian music. It is very interesting.

GOD'S GIFTS  

0 comments Posted by Andrew


Andehe made the comment that so often our faith is one of being flipped upside down, changing and then integrating new dimensions. When I think of my own faith I'm very aware of how flighty it can be - the process of deconstructing and reconstructing can be very hard. However, I hope that this process is found my desire (through the Spirit) to be rooted in Christ - the truly faithful human who takes my flighty, rocky faith and presents it perfect before the Father. I was given this quote last week from a friend (I think it's from James Torrance): "Prayer and worship are not primarily hard tasks that God sets us; they are gifts that through his Son and in his Spirit he shares with us." I think ultimately this is also true of faith - it is God's gift to us that comes by the Spirit through his Son. Faith is about particiapting in the gift that God shares with us - life in Christ. In the Spirit our flighty, rocky faith is lifted up and presented as holy before the Father through the perfect eternal human faithfulness of Jesus Christ our mediator. Faith then isn't all about 'my faith' but the faithfulness of Jesus Christ.

Why are fire engines red?
A fire Engine has four wheels and eight people on it.
Four and eight are twelve.
Twelve inches are a foot.
A foot is a ruler.
Queen Elizabeth is a ruler.
The "Queen Elizabeth" is the largest ship
to sail the seven seas.
The seas have fish.
The fish have fins.
The Finns fought the Russians.
The Russains are red.
Fire engines are always rushin' around.
And that's why fire engines are red!

This seems to be the sort of logic that allows Dan Brown to make some of the connections he makes in the Da Vinci Code. As Conrad Gempf, New Testament lecturer at London School of Theology, said when asked to comment on The Da Vinci Code 'asking a New Testament lecturer to comment on The Da Vinci Code is like asking a Marine Biologist to comment on Finding Nemo!' However, the flimsiness of Dan Brown's research doesn't seem to stop its popularity and when the church points these things out it only adds fuel to the fire - 'of course you'd say that, you're in on this conspiracy!' Steve Hollinghurst asks what would happen if Dan Brown were to admit that The Da Vinci Code was a joke? Would convinced readers simply drop the book's theories? Or might they wonder what Brown was trying to hide or which organisation forced him to say that? How does the church engage with The Da Vinci Code? We need to be careful that we don't use a sledgehammer to tap in a carpet tack! I think rather than point out the flaws in The Da Vinci Code we need to understand the fertile soil that allows The Da Vinci Code to grow. Why is The Da Vinci Code so popular? Our culture today loves secret knowledge and scandals. It does not like authorities or authority figures e.g. Police, politicians, lawyers or churches. In a world of truthiness it all comes down to opinions and my opinion is the only one I can trust! People today trust their own feelings over against the views of authority figures. We mistrust all claims to truth as a will to power and search for 'the real truth' behind the supposed truth and it leads to all sorts of conspiracy theories and thristings for secret knowledge. The church shouldn't laugh too hard at Why Fire Engines are Red - this sort of thinking isn't limited to The Da Vinci Code. Many interpretations of the Bible resemble this sort of logic (or lack of), especially The Book of Revelation! Perhaps the popularity of Left Behind and The Bible Codes is linked to the popularity of The Da Vinci Code - access to secret knowledge and how no one else has seen this before. It's exciting and entertaining but often the logic is the same as Why Fire Engines are Red. But when people challenge it it only reinforces the scandal that the mainstream church is trying to suppress information or is purposely leading people down the wrong path! The Da Vinci Code has met fertile soil indeed!

There is a lot of talk today about the importance of journeying and I'm one of the people who talks a lot about journeying. However David Wells in Above All Earthly Pow'rs suggests that this contemporary theme of journeying resembles little of the biblical theme of journeying. Wells argues that that traditional Christian spirituality (especially on journeying) is one that flourishes within doctrinal parameters (realities of who God is and whoGod calls us to be), demanding that the self live within these parameters. By contrast, contemporary journeying begins with the self. It is rooted in human autonomy and the self is allowed to pick and mix and choose whatever rings its bells. The validation of sources it picks and mixes is whatever benefits the self psychologically and therapeutically. Mixing and matching, discarding and reappropriating ideas is what modern spirituality is all about. Wells quotes Zygmunt Bauman (who I've only read when quoted in other books) who suggests that people today are tourists rather than pilgrims. Now, I've read some who see this postitively! In a pick and mix world the Christian faith has many treasure to put out for spiritual tourists to sample in the hope that they may come to faith in Christ. I myself have tired to encourage and do this. But Wells heavily critiques this approach: 'Tourists are not rooted in the places they visit. They are just passing through, just looking. They are only there for their pleasure and entertainment. They are unrelated to their fellow travelers. They contribute nothing to the country they are visiting (except their cold cash) because they are only there to look and to take in a fresh set of experiences. Tourists never stay; they are always on the move. It is this image, rather than that of the pilgrim, that appears to describe most aptly this new, privatised, experimental spirituality.'

Wells then quotes this poem from Mark Greene called 'Tourists'
Tourists; that’s what we are becoming…
Tourists, we move through life, flitting from idea to idea, from novelty to novelty, from new person to new person,
Never settling, always moving…
Selecting the best sights, the highlights, the choice cuts, avoiding the mess on the edge of town, the slums, all the uncomfortable things, the struggle of really knowing people
Never settling, always moving lest we hear the hollow clang of our own emptiness…
Tourists, that’s what we are becoming…
Inquisitive, curious, picking up the tidbits of other people’s depth…
Tourists, flicking through our snapshots, the paper thin trophies of our click and run existence, filing them away, loading the next roll of film
Never settling, always moving,
Tourists; that’s what we are becoming,

Tourists; that's what we are becoming…

I've been chewing on this for the last week. There's a certain ouch factor as I find it hard to swallow and digest...

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)